General judge John Roberts was drawn into the network of President Trump.
Last week, the president criticized the US Court of Appeal for the ninth region based in San Francisco, calling him “unlawful disgrace”. New York Times writes: “Mr. Trump’s comments appeared after the Federal Process Judge ordered administration to resume accepting asylum claims from migrants regardless of where and how he enters the United States.”
The judge issuing the decision was Jon S. Tigar from the United States District Court in San Francisco, whose Trump quickly stood out as “Judge Obama”. This caused a infrequent redemption from the main judge John Roberts, who said in the statement: “We do not have Obama judges, nor the judges of Trump, Bush judges or Clinton judges. What we have is an unusual group of devoted judges who do the best to level that they appear before them.
The problem, as the president sees correctly, is that the judiciary in too many cases seems independent of the constitution, reading liberal rights in a document that is not there. If all judges considered the same thing, as Roberts suggest, why are there so many 5-4 rulings of the Supreme Court?
Conservatives have long complained that liberal judges are progressing in the field of policy that will never reach through Congress. Besides, if there are no judges of Trump, Obama, Bush or Clinton, why the battle for every candidate nominated by a republican president? Have we forgotten about the recent war of the entire war with the left against judge Brett Kavanaugh?
On the Tweet on the occasion of thanksgiving, the president claimed: “… 9. The circuit has a terrible reputation. It is overthrown than any circuit in the country, 79 percent and is used to obtain an almost guaranteed result … Judges must not secure security and anywhere else. and death.
In fact, the rulings of the ninth circuit are not the most overthrown. According to the data developed by the US Supreme Court blog, it is a special distinction to go to the US Court of Appeal in the case of the 6th District, which is in Ohio.
But this last sentence is the heart of the debate, which has been going on at least since the 1960s, and focuses on what standard should be used to interpret the constitution. Does the Constitution speak for itself, or does it only say what the judges say, says the deceased judge Charles Evans Hughes a hundred years ago?
The president is in a solid position when he claims to keep his office prerogatives. In 1950, the Supreme Court said: “exclusion of aliens is a fundamental act of sovereignty … inherent in the executive power.” Congress increased this authority in 1952, adopting the provisions of declaring the president, “he can by proclamation and during this period he deems necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens and every class of aliens as immigrants or non -immigrants, whenever he believes that it would be harmful to United States interests. “
President Truman vetoed this agent, but Congress passed it. This is a standard that should be used today.
This debate is more than a law between politicians and judges with different points of view. It is about the character and makeup of our country and whether we who live now, we give our descendants something reminiscent of what our predecessors told us.
In the past, most immigrants wanted to learn English, accept culture and become fully Americans, not divided Americans with plans and politicians brought from their homeland.
Thai and back between President Trump and the Supreme Judge Roberts again introduced a real problem at the head, where he will probably remain in the next election and, depending on the result, in the event of elections, until it is resolved in favor or damage to the nation.
