The first debate in the GOP election in 2016 is based on a strict threshold. Of the seventeen candidates applying for the president (including the former Governor of Virginia Jim Gilmore), only ten will be included in the first debate based on national polls.
Last month I received an e-Blast from US Senator Lindsey Graham critical of this standard of debate. Graham, a sturdy foreign policy, has conservatives throughout the country, waving their heads with disappointment. At that time, he began his petition in the polls to enable all candidates to debate. He particularly blew in, in particular, the excessive influence of the “media”, so early deciding about the winners and losers:
If cable information channels or political elites have their own way, the media will have a louder vote in our nominational competition than the actual Republican voters. According to the current rules of the debate supported by RNC Brad Pitt, he would have a better shot on the debate stage than real presidential candidates.
Voters should control our nomination process for the president – not the media.
In accordance with the rules of the media and served by the RNC, the only way to get a ticket for the debate stage is to have a high national electoral number. This criterion favors celebrities and candidates who previously ran with high name recognition.
Suffice it to say that Graham is not Brad Pitt. But why should politicians strive for media hits to enter the first level? The question returns: how does someone decide who can say and who not? There must be a victory process. Even ten candidates on the stage are too much. In addition, Graham’s complaint lies mainly in his own compact number, which is partly his own disadvantage. He ignores a different political reality: good state husbands must be experienced celebrities to succeed in the country, because this is how politics works.
The popularity of the media is an crucial element of conducting the presidential campaign. Barack Obama would not win the presidency without the lend a hand of the press, which based him and promoted him at every step. Looking back 30 years, the Republicans boasted under the banner of the “great messenger” Ronald Reagan, who manipulated the media in their favor, and shaped the reports for a long time before Peter Jennings and Donaldson himself could tear him away. He didn’t run away from the media, but ran to them and then ran over them.
Regardless of whether conservatives like it or not, applying for a national office requires more than the right ideas and the required experience. Candidates must perform on the national stage, move the hearts and minds of potential voters, and inspire uninformed and lackluster to get off the asses and get to the voting card.
Media experience is necessary for this and that is why “Donald” is doing so well (for now) in polls, why Ted Cruz and Rand Paul have effective observations. Trump is celebrated for being a celebrated, a celebrity with skills that could dare the media rather than escape. Apparently Graham undertook this lesson about the need for the media. When Donald Trump leaked to the audience, Graham replied, creating a one and a half minute video clip: “How to destroy a cell phone.” I liked this advertisement. I don’t like Donald. To be truthful, I would prefer to vote for Graham than Trump. Bigger point? With adequate care for the range of the media, the candidate increases his visibility, and thus life.
Despite this, for another reason, for another reason, for another reason, for another reason for another reason for another reason for another reason for another reason for another reason for another reason for another reason for another reason for another reason for another For another reason for another reason for another reason for another reason for another reason for another reason for another reason for another reason for another reason for another reason, it contributes to the care of the media in Thursday’s debate in Thursday’s debate on Thursday’s debate in Thursday’s debate causes another disappointing the result, also from the point of view of politics. The last national surveys indicate that Texas Governor Rick Perry follows at the threshold. Who ranks his place in ninth or tenth place? Governor Ohio John Kasich.
Buckeye Governor is a solid guy. Admittedly, he moved from the NRA from the “D” assessment during his congress term to “A” as a governor. He knows how to talk to people. He won double numbers in his last re -election. He balanced budgets and reduced huge budget deficits in his condition. Due to his political efforts, democrats are a dying race in this swing swing. He even tried to introduce the same collective reforms as the Governor of Wisconsin Scott Walker. He tried to go further and turned on police and fire unions. Kasicha’s plan failed, and the same relationships devoured the initiative and repealed the reforms. Once again: Media news and time matter.
Even worse, Kasich is a great government cheerleader, from the singing of Common Core, to pressing immigration “reform”, i.e. amnesty, including a dissatisfied guest workers program. His worst crime? This Republican pushed Obamacare throughout the country, talking about a sustainable budget amendment for the United States Constitution. Even more disgusting, he summarizes his support for wide-ranging federal programs under the guise of the Social Gospel: “God has a plan for you,” he told prison in prison in Utah. Does this divine plan require the utilize of Caesar to plunder Peter and Paweł?
Entering the federal government into the health care of Americans is a mass invasion that no one can follow. Think Tanks have determined that if Kasich is a nominee – and he will even be elected president – then Obamacare is out of the table. For many conservatives for many Americans this result is simply unacceptable.
Unlike Kasich’s “large government”, an unlimited government with Texas Governor Rick Perry is narrow. Brad Pitt conservatives for many Republicans, Perry is pro-life, pro-gun, pro-menus, anti-member core, anti-obacaacare, anti-amnesty and very popular borders. For 14 years, Perry presided over the meteor’s raise in the economic state of Lone Star, low taxation and high taxation. Texas is currently a destination.
Perry 2012 flew in debates and defeat. Perry’s entry 2016 was not inspiring. Kasich stood delayed, but he works better on domestic media. Although Perry crosses Kasicha on many fronts, Kasich plays a media game and gets the first DIBS in the debate. In politics, media messages and time missions, and conservatives must accept this fact, regardless of whether they like it or not.
