Perhaps you have heard that the Democrats from Congress are underway with a war with the legislation of the White House regarding the legislation of commercial authority – supported by the president and most Republicans, and the opposite of the left flank of the Democratic Party. The “NO” brigade is run by Hardcore statistics Dream. Elizabeth Warren, which successfully pulls the gravitational center of his party to the left. Yesterday the Warrenites designed a filibusterin which every Democrat Senate, but one voted in favor of blocking the debate on the law, which enjoys robust public support on the part of President Obama. (Hillary Clinton remained boldly silent As for this, if you keep the result at home). There were tensions between the White House and the Democrats on the hill, and Salvos was fired up and down Pennsylvania Avenue. Obama raised his eyebrows, calling Warren incorrectly in relation to the facts and rejecting her opposition with this stab: “Elizabeth is, you know, a politician like everyone else.” Serious shade. Here, the hottest political sympathy of the American left, shot in the current hottest political sympathy of America, and some on the left are reflective Demagoguery identity policy fight. Because of course they are:
The National Organization for Women (Now) President Terry O’Neill on Wednesday called the criticism of Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass) President Obama. O’Neill said The Hill During the interview with Yahoo, News published on Saturday published on Saturday. “Yes, I think it’s sexist,“O’Neill said.” I think that the president tried to build his credibility in this matter, convincing us that Senator Warren’s fears should not be taken seriously. But He did it in a sexist way. “
Barack Obama: Sexist. And not only because because of your own dishonest standardHe pays women in the White House much less than men. Sitting liberal senator He went on “Sexism” also:
Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown threw a grenade into the ongoing war of words between the Senator Elizabeth Warren and President Barack Obama, a war that reached modern highlands from Tuesday with the drama clothing of Obama’s commercial sessions in the Senate. Brown, one of the best democratic leaders of the Uprising against Obama’s commercial pressure, criticized the president for what the senator perceived as “disrespect” to Warren and suggested that Warren’s gender could play a role … When she was asked how Obama was without respect for Massachusetts Democrat, Brown replied: “I think that calling her a” other politician. ” He continued: “I’m not going to get more details. I think calling her as a name, when maybe he didn’t do it for the senator’s men? I said enough. “
(Game line):
Here is E -Mail of obtaining Sherrod Brown funds in 2014, in which he advertised a performance with Warren and called Elizabeth. pic.twitter.com/5kwbrenqbp
-E mcmorris-santoro (@evanmcsan) May 13, 2015
He noticed that the sexist Sherrod Brown called Barack’s sexist “sexist” for engaging in exactly the same sexism in which he allowed himself. War. ON. Women. But take care: maybe now and Senator Brown has not heard, but Barack Obama is our first black president, whose opposition is routinely planted as a very fact racism. So I have to ask why these racists drive the “hate climate” surrounding our president and contribute to the “unprecedented opposition”, with which he stands because of the color of his skin? Terry O’Neill and Sherrod Brown checked their white privilege better; Like yesterday. Warren also think about it. Sure, she developed her career, using 100% unverified Folomuloro Folukulor as a fact, but despite “High cheekbones“And” Pow wow chow “is simply another white person. And he will actively hinder our first black president. It is terrifying to see such unanological racial bigotry and well in the 21st century. Oh, and if you were compelling,
slavery He was appointed In this intra-part fight against food, so it’s it.
Apart from this way, fetishists from the “debate” of the left are “debated” nowadays. The opposition is humiliated as illegal – evil and therefore unworthy of further conversation. Misunderstandings do not result from forthright ideological or political differences, they are rooted in sinister bigotry. This line of thinking acts as a substitute for a justified debate. Disqualifies the opponent as First fauna immoral, instead of examining and overcoming his argument. It was designed for silence and intimidation, not convinced. It is (dyspiring and a bit fun, in this case) an inevitable result End of discussionin which the left now turns in contraction of rage powered by intellectual identity. Mark Hemingway notes that Democrats “do not even know how to argue” after years of idle, demagogical condition:
The hopeless attacks rooted in identity policy were fine as long as they were directed to Republicans, but it seems that there is a real consternation over the president in this way. I do not know if the preferred animal metaphor is “what is good for geese …” or “a snake eating your own tail”, but if you are a democrat, you need to worry about this development. It’s because it seems Identity policy has become such a rooted tool of the closest weapon to the Democratic Party that they don’t even know how to talk to each other. For so long, the democratic rhetorical strategy has focused on moral discrediting the opposition as people, not just their ideas. As our first black president, we were told that one could not allow a lack of objection to the attempt to present Obama as a historical symbol of national healing. But one day he participates in women’s Indian senators, which is currently more popular in some key constituencies, and we simply find out that this is another half -white patriarchy tool.
Jon Gabriel has more After subordinating the ideas of the left to the tribal of the knee, which is the main topic Our bookwhich seems more vital overnight.
