Once again, Vice President Kamala Harris has made false and fear-filled remarks about the consequences of an ouster Roe v. Wade, the 1973 United States Supreme Court legalized abortion on demand in all 50 states. A leaked draft opinion early last month shows that the Court intends to do just that Dobbs v. Jackson.
At the beginning her remarks on Tuesdaythe vice president justified her support Roe based on our basic principles. Speaking about the “principles of freedom, liberty and self-determination,” Harris said that “I really think all of these principles are at risk when we look at the leaked draft opinion on what the end result of this decision might be.”
“These principles result, first of all, in the constitutional right to privacy – the right of an individual to make decisions about his or her life, family and body without government interference. The stakes are therefore very high, depending on the outcome of this decision,” she added.
Harris then raised concerns about how “countries that criminalize abortion can require disclosure of a woman’s personal information,” even raising concerns about “the vulnerability of women using period tracking apps.” The mainstream media has a similar opinion on this topic, which I discussed in more detail last month.
The vice president also mentioned “the concern that if Roe is overturned, states that ban abortion could potentially restrict in vitro fertilization if their definition of life begins at fertilization” and that “we believe that states which ban abortion from the moment of fertilization could potentially restrict certain types of contraception – in particular intrauterine devices and the so-called morning-after pill.
“I truly believe that overturning Roe could pave the way for challenges to other fundamental rights, including the right to contraception and same-sex marriage,” Harris said, doubling down on his stance. They all then emphasized, “I think it’s very important that many of the states that have passed trigger-ban laws are also states that are passing laws restricting transgender rights, gay rights, and voting freedom.”
Many media outlets he ran With the vice president claimed that states could roll back in vitro fertilization, as well as contraceptive and same-sex marriage laws.
.@vice president Harris: “I truly believe that overturning Roe could pave the way for challenges to other fundamental rights, including the right to contraception and same-sex marriage.” https://t.co/oPtgLFeCmJ pic.twitter.com/h93IeWEFbZ
— The Hill (@thehill) June 15, 2022
When CNN’s Jake Tapper spoke to Gov. Tate Reeves (R-MS) last month, he not only didn’t bother to hide his disdain for the pro-life position, he asked whether the state Legislature would take steps to implement a contraceptive ban. Reeves replied that they had not considered such an option, although dishonest liberals continued to hound him for this response.
This isn’t the first time Harris has brought the issue of abortion into lithe Roe probably knocked over. In fact, this is at least the third time he has hosted such a roundtable. She made similar claims about consequences Dobbs decision every time.
The White House briefing room shows that there have been a number of meetings on so-called “reproductive rights” in recent weeks.
Not only did the vice president host the roundtable on Tuesday afternoon, but White House staff also participated in it that same day meeting with “State legislative leaders” on the issue and other staff I met with “Asian, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander Leaders.”
Also this month, there were meetings between the White House and “Leaders of religious denominations“, as well as a meeting in connection with “Young leaders for reproductive justice and civil rights“
Last week, the White House also held a meeting on “Disabled reproductive rights activistsAccording to the reading, “Participants discussed the disproportionate consequences that Americans with disabilities would face if Roe v. Wade was overturned and highlighted numerous barriers such as lack of accessible facilities and transportation.”
It is worth noting, however, what the reading did not show, that unborn children are often discriminated against because of disabilities or abnormalities such as Down syndrome, which can be diagnosed in the womb. States are increasingly adopting laws to protect children from abortion on the basis of sex, race or abnormality. Division of the district was allowed in April last year that’s Ohio law come into force.
IN report issued by the Republican Joint Economic Committee in Marchan estimated 60-90 percent of babies diagnosed with Down syndrome in utero are aborted.
Harris is not the only Democrat who has spread fear-mongering lies about the consequences of this decision, although she is certainly a prominent figure. If the draft opinion is precise, as Harris and others are concerned, Justice Samuel Alito emphasized in his draft that: Dobbs the decision only has an impact Roe, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, and the issue of abortion, as Spencer emphasized.
The Supreme Court refused to provide the above-mentioned information Dobbs review on Wednesday. The Court has not yet announced when the next round of opinions will be issued.
