Tuesday, September 9, 2025

Top 5 This Week

Related Posts

It seems that Politico had the stupidest approach to the debate to the vice president

Many polls have shown that Senator JD Vance (R-OH) won the debate of vice president when he went against the government Tim Walz (D-MN) in CBS News. While even Politico I had to admit itThis did not stop them from publishing many amusing articles about the debate of Tuesday night. Probably the worst approach, however, concerned the terrifying expression on Walza, which the editors from Babylon Bee enlisted such an article that could even throw them out of business.

Joel Berry, the editor managing Babylon Bee, shared fragments of the article of the Politico magazine, who said that “Walza’s wide eyes showed his passion.”

“They will be taken out of business,” Berry published in response to another user while making fun of the article.

Blurb on the wide eyes of Walza was certainly to be positive. “When Walz felt particularly passionate about something, he opened his eyes wide, like saucers. Falling in love can sometimes be a sign of surprise, but for Walz it simply revealed his emotional intensity-as this moment during the exchange of abortion, “he explained, the topic that Walz was difficult to get in lies and fear.

“The first people would create such facial gestures to communicate strong emotions, such as” danger is close. ” For Walz, this brought his feelings additional weight and took our look – he also noticed such a can.

Walz’s expression during the debate certainly attracted a lot of attention on Tuesday evening, and many mocked a democratic governor. Apparently he was nervous in the days before the debate and certainly showed it.

Walza’s “wide eyes” was only for one of many references in art “8 Body language talks about the debate of the vice president“Filed by the author Joe Navarro.

There were also many blurbs about Vance and they were smaller than positive. Further absurdity appears here. The first of the eight “says” like “Yes, Vance beard matters.”

“Our appearance is fundamental to our body language, and research indicates that voters perceive beards as (surprise, surprise) more male. This can be positive for some, reading as strength and competences. But for others, especially women, it can be negative, conveying aggression and opposition to feminist ideals – we read in the arms.

Another negative for Vance was related to the hint, how “Vance allowed him to distribute him” to do with the 2025 project, the initiative of the Heritage Foundation, which is in no way associated with the Trump-Vance campaign, although it does not stop democrats from lying, even if they know better.

“When Walz recalled the 2025 project, Vance showed a little saying that it was carrying a great message: a slight darkness of eyes and small wrinkles. Apparently it was a sore topic. When we hear something that we are unhappy or uncomfortable, negative emotions flashes over the face, just as we saw here, “Navarro noted. “We must protect ourselves against such behavior in high rates, such as negotiations or, say, vice presidents-use the opponent, what topics you want to avoid and where your weaknesses are.”

Perhaps this is not so much “Vance weakness”, but the frustration that the Harris-Walz ticket is still a lie about the initiative that has nothing to do with the Trump-Vance campaign.

Even when offering what could have been positive for Vance, in how “Vance noticed his heart”, Navarro was not willing to go down as This conducive to a republican senator.

“It’s such a strong gesture that he often studies in public speeches. But this is a risk: if it seems to be invented, you are in trouble. The descent as dishonest is worse than doing nothing. I can’t say if Vance was authentic or not – I would have to see how he makes a gesture in various contexts. But the movement was aimed at communicating with a chare sentiment. “

In addition to screenshots of the screen, which people were divided into X, there were over 100 answers to Poster Politico, because many took the opportunity to laugh at Walz and his expression.

Politico also published an article about moderators who checked Vance facts after they had previously claimed that they did not. The seller has a predictably focused on how the “Republicans are furious”, which caused more slack against Politico.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular Articles