FBI director James Comey was released again.
Last week, Comey testified before the members of the Committee of the Chamber of the Chamber and the Committee for Supervision and the Government. In one Comey appearance, on 245 separate occasions, while under oath, Stonewalled questions from “I don’t know”, “I don’t remember” or “I don’t remember”, according to the congress interrogator, representative of the representative, representative of Jim Jordan. (R-Ohio).
If any private citizen tried Gambit Comey with federal IRS auditors or FBI investigators, he would probably be accused of perjury or obstacle.
Why did Comey, the best federal investigator in the country, avoided telling “the whole truth and nothing but the truth” during the oath?
The answer is unfortunately obvious. Comey has been repeatedly appointed to testify to congress members. He wrote a long book and went on a extensive concert tour, and his paper trail is long.
He tweets almost every day and is often on television – and in these places he never seems to admit to the passage of memory. And Comey was at the center of every main scandal covering the election in 2016.
In other words, Comey is aware that almost everything he could say will probably be contrary to something he said, did or wrote earlier – and can potentially undergoing him to accuse him of perjury.
So Comey will avoid hedges.
Oddly enough, Comey has long allows contemporary Jeremiah. Almost every day he sinks in the moral falls of his perceived antagonists – mainly Donald Trump, Trump administration and the Republican party, which Comey left.
Comey wrote on Twitter under the pseudonym “Reinhold Niebuhr”-the Silesian 20th-century German-American theologian and ethics. Comey apparently wants to remind us of a similar moral insight.
The memory of Comey is very entitled “Higher loyalty: truth, lies and leadership.” He writes to remind readers of his sterling character, who always led his career. Recently, the selfish Comey said that the Provisional Prosecutor General, Matthew Whitaker, is not very radiant.
It is strange to confess the ethics of Saint Comey, that his claims are invited by his often-uneetic behavior.
The General Inspector of the Department of Justice criticized Comey in a report on unprofessional action in his investigation into the illegal private server E -Mail Hillary Clinton, improperly assuming the role of investigator and the prosecutor. Comey finished and then opened, and then again ended the E -Mail Clinton case at public press conferences during the presidential campaign. He developed Clinton’s release before he even interviewed them or her best helpers.
The Comey testimony about the FBI leaks for the press is contrary to his sworn statements from his former deputy Andrew McCabe.
Comey met President Trump several times and assured him that he was not the subject of the FBI investigation – among mysterious leaks for the press, that Trump was part of the probe.
Speaking of leaks, Comey made sure that his notes about his meetings with President Trump leaked to the press.
Comey said that his strange behavior was designed to mention the appointment of a special adviser, which caused the choice of Robert Mueller, former director of the FBI and longtime friend of Comey.
Many high FBI officials during Comey’s term were released, forced to resign, withdraw, or were again assigned-in some cases resulting from accusations of improper behavior or prejudice.
McCabe was assigned by Comey to supervise Clinton’s e -mail scandal, although only a few months earlier McCabe’s wife applied for a place in the Virginia state senate with the facilitate of almost USD 500,000 USD in the campaign contribution from the Committee for Political Actions related to Clinton.
The FBI Comey is largely responsible for the meaning – and leakage – notorious documentation developed by Christopher Steele. However, Comey did not disclose a foreign court of intelligence supervision, which requests for ordering to supervise a member of the Trump administration were based on an unverified document. The court has never been informed that the documentation was partially financed by the Hillary Clinton campaign. The court was also not informed that Steele, a British citizen, was abandoned as a source of the FBI for leakage to the press. Comey also misled the court, presenting messages as evidence of the tight of Trump-Russia, despite the fact that these stories were based on the content of unverified Steele documentation.
There is no explanations of Comey about why, where, where and how the FBI used the informant in the hope of obtaining harmful information against Trump.
Comey’s holiness and bad people ask many questions. Is Comey an ordinary hypocrite? Does he design his sins on others with guilt? Or did he decide that he is a moralist who helps to isolate himself from the future legal threat?
Or all of the above?
