A 1-year-old boy gets a MMR vaccine in a clinic in Texas in March. Texas was among the states with the most public financial subsidies canceled by Trump’s administration at the beginning of this year. (Jan Sonnenmair/Getty Images)
After Trump’s administration reduced billions in state and local financing of public health From the federal control centers and prevention of diseases at the beginning of this year, the final impact on you have rapidly separated in the political direction.
States led by democratic ones, which sued that the blocking of cuts retained most of their funds, while the countries managed by the Republicans lost their majority, according to the modern analysis from the organization of health research KFF.
Uneven precipitation emphasizes how politics still shape healthcare in the United States. Almost 700 CDC subsidies were worth around $ 11 billion and were assigned by Congress during the Covid-19 pandemic. Since then, state and local health departments have spent or planned to spend money not only on Covid efforts, but also on preventing other infectious diseases, the support of mental health and the employ of substances, raising aging infrastructure of public health and other needs.
According to KFF, the end of the CDC subsidy initially influenced the red and blue. California, the district of Colombia, Illinois and Massachusetts – all run by Democrats – had one of the largest number of subsidies resolved.
But then almost two dozens of blue states and Colombia’s district sued the administration of Trump In April, asking the court to block the subsidy solution. They he argued The federal government lacked the right to cancel the financing he had already assigned.
“The illegal and irresponsible decision of Trump’s administration to regain funding for life-saving health is an attack on the prosperity of millions of Americans,” said New York Prosecutor General Letitia James in April statement Announcement of the process.
“Lowering this fund will reverse our progress in the opioid crisis, throw our mental health systems in chaos and leave hospitals fighting for patients’ care.”
Federal judge on the Blue States side and blocked the appeals – but Limited her order for jurisdiction submitted in the lawsuit.
According to KFF analysis, almost 80% of subsidies were restored in heavenly states, compared to less than 5% in the Reds.
Now four out of five states with the most canceled grants are led by republicans: Georgia, Ohio, Oklahoma and Texas. California, which is dominated by Democrats, retained all the subsidies that were initially resolved.
In the West and the Middle West Colorado led by democratic-who joined the lawsuit-10 out of 11 subsidies. According to KFF analysis, guided by Republicans who will not allow, including Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Utah and Wyoming, they lost all their subsidies.
Stateline reporter Anna Claire Vollers can be achieved at avollers@stateline.org
This story was originally produced by Statlinewhich is part of StatesRoom, non -information information, which includes the Ohio Capital Journal, and is supported by subsidies and coalition of donors as 501C (3) public charity.
