Monday, March 30, 2026

Top 5 This Week

Related Posts

Ohio House of Representatives agrees to compromise on Biden’s ballot amendment if “anti-democratic” Senate provisions are removed

At this point, Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee, would not be on the ballot. “He will 100%” be on the ballot, each lawmaker assured, but some of them were also skeptical whether it would happen through lawmakers or other means.

Ohio requires parties to confirm their presidential nominees 90 days before the August 7 November election. However, Biden will not be an official candidate until the Democratic National Convention on August 19.

Democratic leaders weren’t aware of this, and many other lawmakers across the aisle didn’t know either. Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose reminded Democrats as recently as April.

Theoretically, both the House and Senate have similar solutions to the voting problem, but they have failed to get the legislation signed into law.

The House version was a neat bill that changed the nomination deadline to 74 days, or August 23. This would probably be a indefinite solution.

But the Senate passed a separate bill. This changed the nomination deadline from August 7 to August 23 – but only for 2024, so it was not a indefinite solution.

While the House version simply changes the nomination deadline, state Rep. Dani Isaacsohn (R-Cincinnati) said the Senate version contains unacceptable additions.

“Senate Republicans decided, ‘You know what? We want to get the cost of getting president on the ballot,” Isaacsohn said.

This is “anti-democratic,” Isaacsohn said, along with dozens of other Democrats.

MPs added Senate Bill No. 215, draft campaign finance bill. In early March, Republican senators passed a bill aimed at halting foreign donations to state and local election campaigns. This could be in the form of a direct donation from outside the country or a donation to an entity such as a political action committee (PAC).

Senate President Matt Huffman (R-Lima) explains that this helps prevent disruptions.

“Most Ohioans agree that we should not have foreign dollars influencing our ballot initiatives,” Huffman said.

That’s a mistake, Isaacsohn argued, because the Senate proposal also includes provisions that could make it harder for grassroots movements to get on the ballot — even with U.S. dollars.

It would require all groups to unite on accepting donations and spending money to register as a PAC. This means groups would have to disclose information to the government, which could make it more arduous to collect signatures for a municipal ballot proposal.

The bill also prohibits a lawful indefinite resident of the U.S., also known as a green card holder, from making contributions or expenses related to ballots or candidates.

“All of this is intended to make it more difficult to get voting initiatives in Ohio, which, as we know, allow voters – in the purest sense of the word – to express their vote because it’s a direct democracy,” Isaacsohn said.

Democrats in both the House and Senate say the Republicans who introduced the measure are simply enraged about their 2023 losses.

All three ballot propositions that passed last year were put on the ballot because voters were dissatisfied with the state legislature and didn’t feel like their voices were heard. Lawmakers proposed an August special election because they didn’t want abortion to become legal as a direct result of enraged citizen votes.

SB 215’s bill sponsor, state Sen. Rob McColley (R-Napoleon), said in a previous interview that it would not have a negative impact on local supporters trying to get a stop sign.

“If you’re going to collect and spend money to support signature collection, to support a ballot initiative, you have to report your money,” McColley said.

This type of legislation already exists at the federal level and also applies to candidates in Ohio – but not to ballot initiatives, so it amounts to catch-up in the law, he added.

DeWine agreed.

“I don’t see it as a very controversial issue,” DeWine said. “We shouldn’t have foreigners interfering and spending money in Ohio elections.”

The governor is urging the House to agree, seemingly calling it irresponsible for its lack of action in the process.

“The House of Representatives did not do this – the Legislature was in session yesterday and again took no action,” the governor said. “This is simply unacceptable.”

Huffman also sharply criticized the House in a statement:

“We agree with the voivode. It’s time to protect Ohio’s elections by banning foreign campaign contributions while also correcting the Democratic Party’s mistake that kept Joe Biden from running in the November election. We encourage the Speaker and Minority Leader to allow a vote on House Bill 114, which does both.”

The Senate president’s spokesman appears to be suggesting that Minority Leader Allison Russo is preventing the bill from reaching the floor – even though Stephens has the Republican majority. Stephens has been accused of being too close to Democrats and letting Russo make decisions. The speaker denied this, as did Russo.

House leaders – both Democrats like Isaacsohn and Republicans like House Speaker Jason Stephens (R-Kitts Hill) – continue to say it is not the ban on foreign interference that they are rejecting; are modern restrictions on citizens’ access to voting cards.

Speaker Jason Stephens says he’s willing to compromise – making sure the bill doesn’t “limit citizens’ rights to have their voices heard.”

“We have been pushing for weeks to find a legislative solution to put President Biden on the ballot. Ultimately, there was no will to do so in the Republican caucus.

“Everyone agrees that we must ban foreign political contributions in Ohio election campaigns, and we are moving toward a solution.

“We are using language that includes input from campaign finance experts and crucial stakeholders to address this issue. This is language that explicitly and directly prohibits foreign influence in Ohio’s election campaigns while not unintentionally limiting citizens’ rights to be heard.

“We look forward to seeing real solutions that actually pass through both houses next week and solve the problems.”

The interlocutor makes a connection HB 609a modern foreign exchange law that will not have significant negative impacts on local community members, Isaacsohn said.

Introduced by state Reps. Brett Hillyer (Uhrichsville) and Adam Holmes (R-Nashport), the bill prohibits a committee responsible for a statewide initiative or referendum petition from soliciting or knowingly receiving money from a foreign entity or person. He also considers the bill to be extraordinary.

In a conference call with state Rep. Bill Seitz (Cincinnati), who appears to be the negotiator between the House and Senate, said DeWine spoke with him for an hour and a half about the agenda for the special session.

“These are snap decisions that have to be made in a big hurry,” Seitz said. “Our original plan in the House was for a session on June 12 – we wanted to give everyone enough notice so they could change their plans and plan to visit Columbus on June 12.”

In the case of an emergency clause, two-thirds of the representatives must vote in favor. This could easily be done in the Senate, given that there would be 22 members in the chamber and 26 Republicans in the chamber. In a House where the GOP is split, 66 votes would be needed in an emergency. According to Seitz, there are 67 Republicans, and at least four are unwilling to vote for anything that would support Biden at all. He doesn’t think Democrats would vote to ban foreign money, so he needs to make sure 66 Republicans not only show up but support the bill.

“Many of our colleagues, quite a few of our colleagues, have stated that they will categorically refuse to vote for a bill that simply puts Mr. Biden’s name on the ballot,” Seitz said. “They fear that if they do so, they will be tarred and feathered as loving Democrats.”

However, this poses significant challenges. Bills must be considered on three different days, and the governor’s session will be convened on Tuesday, which means the bill must be drafted and referred to committee on the same day and then continue on Wednesday and Thursday. They have to do it by the time their legal team tells them it needs to be done by Wednesday, and they don’t even have the vehicle to do it.

There is no option to suspend the House rules as that would also require a two-thirds vote in the chambers, the lawmaker said.

“The fundamental difference between what the Senate wants to do so far and what we want to do is the number of words the Senate is using to do it, as opposed to the simpler strategy that our legal counsel is recommending,” he added. he said. “I appeal to both sides: ‘Let’s skip this dispute over who will write the bill.'”

To say Stephens and Huffman are political enemies is an understatement. click here to learn more about GOP infighting.

When asked whether the competition contributed to the defeat. Seitz said no. Every Democrat and every Republican interviewed – except Seitz, Stephens and Huffman – said so.

“Wouldn’t it make more sense politically for Republicans to want Biden on the ballot because if Biden isn’t on the ballot, it could slow down turnout for Trump?” – I asked Seitz.

“You’re 100% right,” the Republican replied, noting that former President Donald Trump, U.S. Sen. J.D. Vance, U.S. Senate candidate Bernie Moreno and all Ohio Republican Party leaders want Biden on the ballot.

The special session is scheduled to begin on Tuesday afternoon.

How can Biden get on the ballot?

The DNC may announce earlier. Or lawmakers might do something on tiny notice that even Seitz seems nervous about.

Lawmakers suggest Democrats could go to court to ensure the president’s participation in the vote.

Jonathan Entin, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University, said no court case would succeed. Learn more about its analysis Here.

“What appears to be taking place once again reflects the dysfunction of Ohio government,” Entin said. “There are plenty of mistakes that can be attributed to almost anyone.”

You can blame Democrats for their ignorance of the law, the entire legislative leadership for their unwillingness to cooperate and constant bickering, and LaRose for “waiting until practically the last minute to raise this issue,” the professor added.

“It’s hard to imagine anyone going bankrupt without appreciating the irresponsibility of Ohio officials handling this situation,” Entin sighed.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular Articles