Entering the debate against Ohio Sen. JD Vance, Governor of Minnesota Tim Walz, had a rotten set of cards. Unlike former President Donald Trump, Vance skillfully, calmly, commanding, played with humor and compassion. He dominated the debate in matters that voters care about the most – economy, maintenance costs, gas prices and illegal immigration.
Walz tried to explain how Vice President Kamala Harris and President Joe Biden are not responsible for: achieving a 40-year level of inflation; how Americans now pay 50% more for gas; Why a typical family of four now spends USD 1200 per month on goods and services compared to four years ago; How and why Biden-Harris allowed about 12 million illegal aliens, not reproduced, to enter the country; And how the world has become more unsafe under the leadership of Biden-Harris.
When it comes to these problems, Harris, Walz, most of the media-hated Trump, a significant part of the academic environments, Hollywood players and social media platforms of immense technologies-Xon, belonging to Elon Musk, and the Americans tell the Americans: “Don’t believe in lying eyes.” And if you believe them, ignore them because “democracy is in the voting card”, “reproductive rights (code for abortion) are voting” and Trump is an existential threat to every living creature.
Forget about the former democratic presidential candidate and secretary of state John Kerry, complaining that the first amendment is the “main block” in the scope of raising awareness of climate change and stopping “disinformation”. Ignore the Gavin Gavin Governor, which has just signed the act on criminalization of political “deep” advertising, apparently in this advertisement of parody, made of artificial intelligence.
The former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wants the crime to disseminate Russian conversation points.
“But I also think that there are Americans who are involved in this kind of propaganda and (we should consider) whether they should be civilian, and even in some cases, accused of crime …” – she said in a recent interview with Rachel Maddow from MSNBC.
But Asset Is the threat to our republic?!
Speaking of Clinton, Vance moved her during the vice president of the debate on Tuesday, when he was asked: “Trump still says that he did not lose the election. Did he lose the election in 2020? “
“Of course, Donald Trump and I think that there were problems in 2020,” said Vance. In what anti -tumors hailed on his debate night, Walz called it “a violent answer.” But Vance noticed that Clinton is still describing the defeat of the election in 2016 as “stolen”.
In this matter, Vance had a lot of restless ammunitions. He could add that Clinton constantly called President Trump “illegal”. Former President Jimmy Carter in June 2019 publicly attributed the victory of Trump’s interference Russia. But in the article on the study of the influence of Russian interference in the elections in 2016, a study conducted by the New York University Center for Social Media and Politics showed that “… Despite the operation of Russia’s influence on the platform, there were no measurable changes in attitudes, polarization or voting among those exposed to this foreign campaign.” No measurable posture change? However, the Gallup survey in 2018 was found that 78% of Democrats believe that Russian interference “changed the result of the election.”
Former secretary of internal security Barack Obama, Jeh Johnson, said that the Russians, despite their efforts, could not be changed one vote. Not one. But the YouGov survey from 2018 was found that 66% of Democrats believe that “Russia has changed in voices to choose Donald Trump.” The same crowd condemning Vance “Cursed Non-Requirements” sat quietly when Democrats Al Gore, John Kerry and Hillary Clinton questioned the ID card of the election defeat.
Biden offered his cursed not answer, asked if he would accept the result of the mid-term election of 2022. At that time, most experts-Democrats were afraid of the Red-Wave “Red Wave. Biden answered Trump: “It can easily be illegal. I will not say that this will be justified. … The enhance in the prospect of being illegal is directly proportionally for us that we are not able to conduct these (voting) reforms. “
Vance effectively argued Trump’s case about the economy, maintenance costs, borders, foreign policy, pro -abortion extremism of democrats and destroying elections.
Who won the debate? President Trump.
