Liberal journalists love to paint Republicans as opposed to facts – which implies that liberal journalists are facts and determine who actually uses them.
The Washington Post placed this aggressive headline at the front of the edition of October 15: “The campaign is the opposite control of facts: in live settings Trump strives for his lies to remain unquestioned.”
Reporters of Ashley Parker and Josh Dawsey began by noticing that Trump’s campaign “conducted an aggressive campaign against checking facts in recent months”, “by forcing the media to” abandon the practice, if they hope for interaction with Trump. “
They described the reluctance of former President Donald Trump in relation to a policy joining the Anti-Trump brigade at the National Association of Black Journalists Beatdown and “checking the facts” that took place during the ABC debate with the Vice President of Kamali Harris, as well as Trump, apart from “60 minutes” over CBS “checking facts”.
One key fact appeared very late from this story of Republicans-Nenage-Dramatic imbalance of the one who is marked as false. Moderators of the ABC debate distinguished Trump for five combat “facts control”. Moderators of the CBS debates said that they would not check the facts, and then pushed JD Vance on Haitan migrants in Ohio. The word “moderator” is a bad joke.
Parker and Dawsey returned to the old one they saw that “the Checker Fact Washington Post band achieved that at the end of the presidency of Trump he gave 30,573 false or misleading claims – on average about 21 false, erroneous or misleading claims a day.”
They did not mention that Glenn Kessler, “Checker Fact”, announced in 2021, will not be systematic counting of false or misleading statements by President Joe Biden. Does this suggest that “checking facts” is a weapon used against Republicans? And he reveals the partisan tilting that Democrats are extremely forthright politicians?
Looking at their main page “checking facts” on October 15 shows that this dramatic imbalance is still in force. Just counting Pinocchios cartoons on the first page shows that Trump and his team drew 39 Pinocchios. Team Harris has … zero. There is one article in which Dainly notes: “Harris Fubs a production work claim in an interview with MSNBC.” Seven articles on the Trump side receives a maximum judgment of “four Pinokhios” (heating pants).
The recent checking of facts at the Media Research Center at Politifact shows similar aggression. There are 24 “combustion” rulings for Republicans from January to September (20 of them Trump) only for Democrats (Governor JB Pritzker from Illinois). In general, Republican politicians were assessed as “mainly false” or worse 79% of cases, while the democrats were only in this penalty box in 36% of cases.
Post reporters found a liberal expert who confirmed his topic. Professor of the University of Wisconsin Lucas Graves has gained a great, brave and courageous quote in the newspaper: “As part of the political establishment on the right, this is currently considered quite justified-and quite justified speaking in public and opening-that you do not agree with checking facts.”
“Tribalism” is opposing the liberal checking of facts. But it cannot be said that this is “tribal” for liberal proven facts to destroy Republicans much more often and much more severe. They should be accused of the brutality of the advertising police.
Of course, the post undertaken this partisan, citing how liberal prejudice took place liberal mockery in “Saturna Night Live” NBC, where Bowen Yang, Asian comedian playing Vance, said: “Don’t check it” many times in one sentence.
It is a good liberal journalists love to strike: we can’t be criticized. Oppose us and hate facts, journalism, safety, mental health and democracy. They have a monopoly on the truth – whatever they decide.
