Conservative Senators Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio repeated their roles as Trump’s fierce critics during the last presidential debate in Detroit, mercilessly attacking the fermentaries they are chasing. Their positioning last night, as in the last debate in Houston, was symbiotic. One would hit Trump and land a few blows, and the other after passing, keeping pressure as a billionaire. A few additional thoughts about each candidate:
(1) Ted Cruz won this debate. He was edged, concentrated and ruthless throughout the event, turning Trump’s attacks into an effective counterattack. His strongest moments strongly pressed on his Trump many donations until 2008 Hillary Clinton 2008 presidential A campaign, a topic that he linked with several subsequent answers. He was also a prosecutor subject to his insistence that Trump allows New York Times To make a sound of a stationary conversation about immigration. Trump refused several times. He also took a Drwin from Trump about the survey and transformed it into a key point. Trump advertised the CNN survey, indicating that he has a very gigantic national leader in the basic Republican. Cruz counted exactly the same survey that shows that both he and Rubio conduct Hilary Clinton in terms of electoral vote in this study, while Trump loses. Even when he was not a stunning Trump, Cruz proposed prepared and commanding answers in the litany of problems. His reaction of embedding unsuccessful leftist leadership in the city of Detroit was powerful, as well as his points about the Supreme Court. A very powerful night for him.
(2) Marco Rubio did well. As usual, Floridian performed skillfully at the stage of the debate, repeatedly challenging and throwing Donald Trump – at the same time releasing Cruz (who turned kindness). His feistiness at the early moments of the debate gave the tone, calling Trump to always respond to substantive criticism with personal, superficial answers. Asset
confirmed this criticism time and again. Rubio was particularly aggressive in blowing up Trump at his unsuccessful university of fraud, at some point covering the billionaire to admit that he returned “many” dissatisfied customers. This, after Trump misled that 98 percent of students were satisfied with their experience and falsely demanding the assessment of A Better Business Bureau. In the lasting years of the existence of the University of Trump, he received Grades D and D-Minus. Like Cruz, Rubio was fluid and significant in a wide range of problems, often circling the lack of seriousness and specific knowledge of Trump. One of the funniest moments of the debate occurred when Cruz laughed at Trump for his constant breaks, encouraging him to “breathe”. After a playful exchange about the yoga explosion on the stage, Rubio interjected: “It is very flexible”, referring to Previous answer from Trump. Clever and agile. The reason why Cruz won on Rubio is that the latter seemed a bit more tired than usual, and sometimes seemed to cross the line into diminutive quarrels. In this way, he shook Trump, but configured Cruz to get more effective answers. Sitting in CPAC Debate Watch Party (organized by Townhall Media) there was a noticeable feeling among the majority of the majority of anti -crumple that the alliance of two teenage senators should go beyond the stage of the debate.
(3) John Kasich stood out with his niche.
Perhaps there is no nomination path, even if Ohio wins, but the governor played very well last night. He returned over and over to his main message: while these guys are arguing and offended by each other, Americans want an adult with a proven record of actual helping people and achieving things – and it’s me. It was his Schtick for months. At this stage, it seemed to be valid and convincing. And according to Focus group Frank LuntzaTons and message of Kasich.
(4) Donald Trump remains a man to defeat. During the second in a row, he was revealed as a politician … Well, lithe, both by his rivals and Fox News moderators. Fox repeatedly checks Trump’s facts in real time, unmasking the flip, inconsistency and political void. Whether it affects voters, but I would not focus on a significant change. One of his strongest returns is to make fun of opponents as talking, impatient politicians. He often used him last night, causing applause from his supporters. If Cruz and Rubio were able to raise significant doubts about his business success and the top (and immigration attitude), this may affect. But the question is: will these attacks come too delayed in this process to really sink and change the result? Maybe. Trump’s best answer at night was his last, when he laughed at the suggestion that anyone else could win the nomination, he said the gap in the enthusiasm of GOP over the democrats in this cycle and repeated his promise of loyalty in almost Litur. Okay close to him. There is still a path to overcome it, but it is
terribly difficult. Trump also raised 11/11 conspiracy theory unquestioned and raised the topic to which he has his own little hands The size of his masculinity From the presidential stage of the debate. It happened. I will leave you:
I beat Hillary Clinton in so many polls. pic.twitter.com/zuihirzlz0
– Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) March 4, 2016
UPDATE – I analyzed the debate last night with the moderator of Megyn Kelly, through proper observations:
