Monday, March 30, 2026

Top 5 This Week

Related Posts

Eight reasons why Republicans of the Senate must stop all actions to fill in the Scalia place

First of all: Barack Obama pulls out the same fraud that he pulled out with the Taomey-Manchin weapon control packet.

Do you remember how the state of the Union stops: “They deserve loud!”?

So gullible Republicans gave them a “voting”.

What happened?

We won by the skin of the teeth – not thanks to the partial submission of Republicans. (If Lisa Murkowski FlakdyÅ‚a, there is no doubt that Reid would receive four “swing democrats” he had in the reserve and achieved victory).

But GOP paid a terrible price for enabling the process to go further than he should. Kelly Ayotte, Dean Heller, etc., spent a year, repelling the “victims” that planted them at meetings in the town hall – victims who were encouraged to act by the fact that some Republicans came to the narrative “deserve voting” and let the trial move forward.

If GOP was first hailed, they justified, inexorable pressure could cause them to catch again.

Now we are in the face of the next “They deserve loud!” Scenario in a relationship with the headquarters of Antonin Scalai.

But when Obama says: “They deserve loud!”, He means “they deserve voting” yes “!”

And entering Obama at the beginning of this process will not bring one scintilla respite from Obama or the press.

Secondly: Barack Obama understands that every incremental progress in this process – starting with an agreement on conducting interrogations – creates incremental victories that feed the shoot.

Thirdly: every incremental progress in this process makes it easier for parliamentary forcing a successful vote on confirmation. After interrogations, REID will simply move to unload the nomination. If he manages to ponderous down, he will try “nucle” in voting on confirmation. Thanks to the victory in the case of 50 votes (plus biden), DeMs would only have to choose four Rinos.

By the way, for those who do not think, does it mean, whether the Judiciary Committee conducts interrogations or not, I would ask: Would you prefer to be on your own line of 10 yards or opponents?

Four: Any incremental progress in this process makes it easier to focus on history.

If nothing happens, after all, the press will be forced to drop it. But not if the Republicans still create a “history”.

Friday: Every incremental progress in this process allows Obama to “put a human face” to the nomination.

Of course, a veteran who goes to prison after the VA weapon prohibition-his wife kept his weapon to self-defense-uneven will not have a “face” in the media. His family is not.

Six: The longer the nomination remains a problem, the easier it will be to choose Republicans.

And the easier it will be to cause pain to the Republicans.

Seven: Republicans have not yet demonstrated the ability to explain the rates.

As four different law professors said in the New York Times in the article on Friday, if Obama appoints the successor, the second amendment will be effectively repealed.

Abortion will be legalized until the ninth month – and the little sisters of the destitute will be forced to finance it.

The coal industry in Western Pennsylvania and Eastern Ohio will be closed.

If the Senate Republicans cannot understand the political usefulness of the saying that voting for Ted Strickland, Maggie Hassan or Russ Feingold is voting for effective repealing the second amendment – in full – it is not complex to understand why Donald Trump works rings around them.

Eight: Taking any action justifies the process.

Forget whether Anthony Kennedy’s confirmation of 1988 confirms the 80-year-old precedent or opposes him.

If Clinton wins, we will also call to defeat her nominees.

Rather, the problem is whether the most unlawful president in history can appoint an unlawful puppet judge who stamps his unlawful actions.

Like Kagan and Sotomayor, Ginsburg and Breyer, the candidate would lie (seductively) about the lack of opinions about the second amendment.

But because at least three of these liars explained in the McDonald case, they have a very robust opinion. The opinion is that Heller should be reversed and the second amendment should be torn out of the constitution.

There will never be a “right” time.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular Articles