New Jersey Governor Chris Christie is on a diet, he moves away and speaks around the country – a certain sign that he is in the race for the nomination for the president of GOP 2016.
Overweight, the prosecutor was arduous, who gained the brand, putting the crooked democrats and republicans behind bars, received a tidy health card this month, when the investigation cleared him in the outrageous closure of the belt on the George Washington bridge.
The long, nine -month -old federal probe in the fiasco of grubby tricks that threatened Christie’s political future, said that she found nothing that means the governor in the so -called “Bridgegate” scandal.
The blunt style of Christie’s policy may not be for everyone, but he won him legions of fans who are looking for an effective political warrior on their behalf. He was accurately described by the former speech writer in the White House, and now the syndicated columnist, Michael Gerson, as “Ford Gran Torino from GOP-Nieco policy, but V-8 under the hood … with some dents.”
He will enter the crowded field of republican candidates who also test water, but with one massive difference than two years ago.
In contrast to the tender, massive luggage of the would -be presidential field in 2012, this cultivation of candidates is largely consisting of politically tested governors or former governors who conducted their state rule, struggled with legislators, pushed through programs, and balanced budgets. And even half a dozen of them, it finally counts.
In brief, they are pointed with an inexperienced passenger of the White House, who never led anything, even a stand for lemonade – from which is not a failed general director, who presided over the tender, tender, inferior economy for the economy for the last six years.
Barack Obama has many other failures, one of which does not know how to lead the government. Indeed, it is arduous to remember the previous president, who had so many political scandals and departments.
Politically based on the pursuit of undermining conservative educational groups; Deadly hiding veterans in the administration, in which the infirmed veterans could not get medical care, which they desperately needed; Shocking lack of response of the State Department about the facilitate of the US Ambassador in Bengazi, Libya; Division of management in the Internal Security Department.
It’s a bit too early to find out who runs in the GOP 2016 lottery. It will undoubtedly be slightly brighter after the election in the middle of November 4.
But it is not a stretch that Republican voters, after two conditions of an incompetent president, whose number of approvals in the workplace is in the basement, they will look for a tested leader who has things in the history and will do a lot, if not the majority, his program introduced his program .
In other words, it is more than the likely that the nominated GOP in 2016 will be a governor. Christie was at the top of this long list in the polls.
Just under Christie in a real political survey is the former governor of Florida Jeb Bush, who claims to make a decision by the end of this year or at the beginning of next year.
Both are well known, great names, but they can face other governors in the GOP-Jak Rick Perry from Texas, Scott Walker from Wisconsin, Bobby Jindal from Louisiana and John Kasich from Ohio, a key, obligatory election election state.
There are also senators of first -year students: Rand Paul of Kentucky (which is third in surveys) Ted Cruz from Texas and Marco Rubio from Florida. They are one of the novel parties, although everyone is in the first categories and still learn lines.
But Republicans usually do not choose first graders as their nominees, preferring experienced candidates who have been on the track once or twice or even three times. Think, for example, Ronald Reagan.
Meanwhile, Republicans must begin to seriously think about what will be great decisive problems in 2016, which belong to the highest fears of the American nation.
First of all, it is clear, even at this stage, that the terribly impoverished economy of Obama, long -term unemployment, the shrinking labor force of the nation and to a vast extent flat middle class income will still be overriding problems in two years.
A candidate who wins the GOP nomination will be the one who makes economic concerns the main goal of his candidacy. Whoever does not have words about the unsuccessful economic policy, which Obama and his party inflicted on our country, which wounded tens of millions of income about lower and medium income, who told the interviewers that they were still fighting.
The exploding federal debt is very close to this problem, the result of six years of record budget deficits, which not only threaten the solvency of our nation, but also our national security.
Then Obamacare comes and how Obama and his party repeatedly told us that if we like our medical care policy, we can stop it. His lie was revealed when millions of us received notifications that our policy would be resolved and we had to get novel ones, which, which is not surprising, cost more than our previous plans.
Then the naive foreign policy of the president from the war with terrorism appears, which led to the revival and much greater threat abroad and to our own national security here at home.
All these are victorious problems in themselves. But they demand an experienced, confident, but balanced leader who can refer to a much wider electorate about the agenda with a vigorous sense for change.
These are the hazardous times in which we fell into it will require an extremely qualified candidate to restore our country to prosperity and renewal.
So choose America carefully and wisely. In two years this may be the most significant decision we have ever made during the generation.
