Dan rather, once an outstanding journalist “false but precisefame, I would like to share it A few thoughts on last week’s auditions in Bengazi. Suffice it to say that
Long -time partisan of the Democratic Party it is obvious Ready for Hillary:
A shiver of legs is given rather after Hillary’s performance in Benghazi. Laboratory example of narrative: pic.twitter.com/0cfnnt2srk
– Guy Benson (@Guypbenson) October 26, 2015
Such an unmoved balance, maturity and stoicism in the face of a nasty, constant grunting of these terrible republican Neanderthals. Although the giggle from this relic of the past era is tempting, getting rid of all appearances of impartiality, deprived of the content of the Ode to the performance of Hillary is demoralizingly representative of wider media reactions. And “performance” is really a key word. How Comments Noaha Rothman and others they noticedpress obsessive focus On the behavior of Mrs. Clinton – her calculated peace, ostentatiously telegraph boredom, her precise avoidance of exacerbations worth attention – actively subordinates the essence of what actually happened in this room of interrogations, superficial optics. According to history, she “won” this day because she kept cold and evaporated the attacks of Republicans with verve and mastery. And when the conventional wisdom of the elite media was strongly established (it began to cook on Twitter in the first minutes of her testimony), the discussion immediately moved to the analysis of the impact of her great victory on horse races. A significant discovery that SEC is almost widely ignored or overlooked in this report. Clinton knew with immediate clarity and certainty that the raid in Bengazi was a coordinated terrorist attack, not a “spontaneous protest” caused by the movie on YouTube “Without an event”. The “Wall Street Journal”. Kimberly Strassel presents Flashing neon messages, which many of her journalists did not want to notice. First, the appropriate context and background:
At the beginning of September 2012, at the National Democrats Convention, Vice President Joe Biden, with a deafening applause, summed up the administration proposal regarding re -election: “Osama bin Laden is dead and General Motors is alive.” Translation: The president revived the economy, although he forced “Al-Qaeda to escape”, as Obama put it. Four days later, four Americans in Bengazi were dead. It seemed that the White House slept a terrorist attack on the anniversary of September 11. Instead, the administration immediately presented the attack as a impromptu reaction of the crowd to the anti -Muslim movie on YouTube. At 10:30 on the night of the attack, Mrs. Clinton issued a statement on violence, blaming the video. The next day, she repeated the allegations in the speech. President Obama gave his own speech that day, referring to the video recording and refusing to apply the word “terrorism”. The next day, Mrs. Clinton mentioned the film twice. A day later, press secretary Jay Carney said: “We don’t have information suggesting that it was a planned attack.” Mrs. Clinton promised the father of one of the victims that the administration would “make sure that the person who made this film was arrested and brought to court.” In his weekly speech, Obama talked about this film. When the Libyan president said that there was evidence that the attack was planned for several months in advance, UN ambassador Susan Rice denied him. Instead, she said five Sunday talk show – five days after the attack – that “based on the best information we have so far”, the attack “began spontaneously” in response to “this hateful film”. Obama spoke about YouTube for a full two weeks.
… and then newly made public information:
Here are the findings of the Commission from Bengazi during Thursday’s audition. Two hours after the testimony of Mrs. Clinton, as MP from Ohio Jim Jordan mentioned E-mail, which Mrs. Clinton sent to her daughter Chelsea at 23:12 on the night of the attack, i.e. 45 minutes after the secretary released a state of statement in which he blamed the crowd enraged through YouTube. In its email we read: “Two of our officers were killed in Benghazi by a group resembling al queda.” Mrs. Clinton does not protect herself in e-mails; No “seems” or “seems”. He tells his daughter that on the anniversary of September 11, the Al-Qaeda group murdered four Americans. That same evening, Mrs. Clinton talked on the phone with President Libya Mohamed Magariaf, around 20:00. In the notes from this conversation contained in the e-mail of the State Department, it was described as follows: “We asked the Libyan government to provide additional protection to immediately go to the complex, because there is a shooting, which I understand Ansar as a sharia [sic] takes on responsibility. ” Ansar Al Sharia is an Al-Qaeda unit on the Arabian Peninsula. So, a few hours after the attack, Mrs. Clinton was convinced that Al-Qaida was attacking American facilities. The next afternoon, Mrs. Clinton talked with the prime minister of Egypt Hesham Kandil. Notes from it are absolutely condemning. The Secretary of State tells him: “We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack, not a protest. ” And yet Mrs. Clinton, Mrs. Rice and Mr. Obama spread the video of all day.
Nothing to do with the movie. Planned attack, not a protest. Strassel’s conclusion: “[Hillary Clinton’s] Own conversations prove that she had no doubt as to what happened, although it was still the case. Democrats in the committee spent most of the interrogation, complaining that it was a waste of time and money. Quite the opposite. It was priceless because of the clarity that these three emails provided. ” But no matter previously seen, smoking evidence that the Secretary of State and the White House actively and consciously misled the American nation as to the nature of the terrorist, an attack in which four Americans were murdered, including the incumbent ambassador – on the anniversary of September 11 in the burden of jihadists, An unstable country where the administration was just intervening militarily on her expression and above -average “balance”. By the way (unnecessarily flashy), the confrontation of Mrs. Clinton with these evidence was not the only moment that caused surprise in her answer to the question of why no one was released due to deadly failures in Bengazi, was feeble and unacceptable; She claimed that her internal protocols tied her hands. And we all know what a stiff She is about internal protocols.
Another persuasive event were regular exchange of Clinton’s sentences with a suspicious political support Sidney Blimenthalem, an employee of the Clinton Foundation, whose White House of Obama
specially prohibited from the State Department. These numerous interactions were compiled with the statement that Clinton’s “Dear Friend”, Amb. Chris Stevens did not know her personal e-mail address and that Clinton did not receive any of the dozens of security. In other words, notoriously deprived of scruples, a political agent had unlimited access to the Secretary of State, through which he routinely transmitted unconfirmed intelligence information and promoted his business interests in Libya, yet the critical requests of the US ambassador in this unstable and unsafe country never came to the effect . to her desk. One might think that part of the press can consider this solution as at least somewhat problematic. Other questions about Mr. Blmenthal revealed that Clinton gave his cheesy intelligence data to his administration colleagues, not knowing their original source, while deleting the name of Blimenthala from the message, probably because of his reputation. And Mrs. Clinton insisting that E-mails and observations of Blimenthala were “unwanted” was systematically destroyed by her own emails, in which she clearly asked him for more information. Finally Clinton Change of definitions what is a “personal” correspondence seemed to be preparing the foundations for the modern round of justifications whether and when (even more) Work letters she hid from the Department of State and tried to delete, finally came to lightweight. Certainly
Some These events can at least be perceived as noteworthy deficiencies in connection with the epic beating by Hillary conspirators from Benghazi, right? I will leave you with a screenshot Hillary’s own words to the Egyptian official, given the day after the attack – and a few days before She met with mourning family members and fell to blame for the death of their loved ones on a protest regarding video recording on the Internet:
I stood in front of 4 coffins decorated with flags and blamed YouTube pic.twitter.com/nouzhytqtn
– Stephen Miller (@redsteze) October 22, 2015
But did she speak her lies towards mourners with broken hearts with unmoved grace and composure? If so, it’s a great victory for her.
